I also think the retrospective reviews, such as the one by Jeremy Perish, should be placed towards the end, since it makes it sound like they reviewed the game when it was first released. The comments made by reviewers should be weaved together into sentences, not just listed one by one like this article does. The Reception section likely needs to be rewritten.
Lovecraft novel The Shadow over Innsmouth, however the only similarity to it is the presence of fish-like monsters." I think this should be changed to something like "The game was inspired by the H.P.
In spite of this, the only similarity between the two is the presence of fish monsters" This part, to me at least, reads awkwardly. Lovecraft novel The Shadow over Innsmouth.
"though it never released" should be "thought it was never released". What does it mean to "go up" and "go down", does it mean you go into the next room or something? "The game features 45 levels, but a run will only have a selection of 13 of those, which are selected based on how quickly players complete them if they finish in the first 30 seconds, they go up, and if in the last 30 seconds, they go down." I'm really confused to what this means. The they refers to players playing it, and in my experience player or players is acceptable, it is just a matter of personal opinion. Who is "they" in the Gameplay? Does it mean the player? Since this game appears to be single-player only, the article shouldn't have "players" or "they" in it. The sources used in the gameplay section cover everything. Lots of bits in the Gameplay section are not sourced. Not sure why the Famitsu score is part of the Reception paragraph. Planet Virtual Boy is not a reliable source and needs to be replaced. Namcokid 47 (Contribs) 16:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC) Reply Will get to this soon once I wrap up my draft for Final Blaster.
0 kommentar(er)
